Indiana University Bloomington

Salle pomme rouge sur la terre

Rose Guingrich, psychology

Written for COLL-C103: Original Sin

Instructor: Prof. Constance Furey


Salle pomme rouge sur la terre

Started from the very bottom

Falling into my desires

The light at the end is too far

It promises goodness, but I

Settle for my earthly shadows

Mere reflections in murky pools

Drowning crisp clear skies with rainbows

 

La pomme ne peut pas bouger

 

I have dug my forsaken grave

The way out, forgotten by choice

I could ask for aid, but not yet

Content where I am, but yet not

The word strikes mon coeur faible

Is this heart wrongly directed?

Passion’s aim must be corrected

 

Ses mains la lavent avec douceur

 

Helpless on my own, oui, j’étais

Flailing and failing in my strife

 

Mais Vous me unifie avec l’amour

And showed me the source of all reflections

Given the strength, I can drop my last pear

And I am pulled outside, to crisp, clear air

La lumière that I could never grasp

 

Maintenant, oui, elle vit dedans


Belle pomme rouge au rayon 

Sprinkled with water at first breath

I woke up smelling wild lilacs

What’s desire when nothing’s lack

Pears, good to eat, are soft and sweet

My veins are vines of blood red grapes

Nature, pure, sons of Adam, grown

Connected by limb, root, and bone

 

Meurtrit dessous des nouvelles pommes

 

I plant but nothing seems to grow

Mocked by beauty, raked by the thorns

Grapes in the sun, eaten or dried

Is this natural, is this pure

What, this shadow to which I bow

From foot to neck the vines they crawl

Deadly serpent beckons, catcalls

 

La nature fait brune la pomme

 

The leaves have all turned brown and black

Sinking into earth, it’s just dirt

 

The cycle continues, forever as

I fall, what comes next but the grim darkness

Eternity in a decaying grave

Summer, spring, winter, fall, what is the point

Of it all? Progress, why, if all trees fall?

 

Elle est l’engrais pour ses enfants


The first poem (Salle pomme rouge sur la terre) is from the point of view of Augustine in Confessions, and the second (Belle pomme rouge au rayon) is from the perspective of a naturalist.

The poems have two languages, French and English, to represent that both narrators have two opposing wills. One will is as foreign to the other just as French is to English, even though both wills come from the same source, as both languages are romantic languages derived from Latin. As Augustine grows closer to God as the poem progresses, one language is used in unison more frequently with the other language which represents the two wills becoming more incorporated (Vous me unifie – you unify me). For the naturalist, the two wills are in the same sense being in conflict with one another, making the narrator feel discord with her view of human nature. She questions her own beliefs and asks “What’s the point of it all?” The first septet of both poems represents how the two begin. Augustine is born into sin and bound by his earthly lusts and desires, and he settles for loving partial things instead of what is truly good, meaning he loves what God has made and not the Creator himself (shadows, reflections). The naturalist believes she, like nature, is born pure, and that the entire world is made for her and she is completely connected to all aspects of the earth. The second septet represents a transition period, in which Augustine realizes how contradictory his actions are, how he’s essentially his own obstacle to happiness, and that his passions are not directed toward God. The naturalist realizes that people turn from nature and purity because what is unnatural (ex. glorified alterations such as makeup and surgery) is considered beautiful, and there is pain and death and love for material things (the vines), and damaging things like lust (the deadly serpent). The final septet that is broken up into a couplet and a quintet represents an irrevocable upset and realization of how wrong they are, and what that means for the rest of their life, respectively. For Augustine, he is given the answer to the riddle that is himself, freedom from the bonds of sin, and the promise of clarity as to what his purpose is. For the naturalist, she realizes that she means nothing to nature, that she is just a small part of this large, unforgiving cycle that promises nothing but death. Progress for humanity is one benefit if nature is all there is, but if progress requires industrialization, then what will be left but concrete and buildings created by the destruction of nature?

While the naturalist is going backwards, Augustine is moving forward. She starts from goodness and beauty and ends in pain and confusion. He goes from being troubled and imperfect to having peace and feeling loved. Mother Nature lets her decay and eventually die (la nature fait brune la pomme – nature turns the apple brown), but Father God promises eternal life (la lumiere within, not far away – the light representing life).

They have similar problems, which both have to do with not loving the source but being distracted by the things of the world, but the way to get to their solution different. Augustine’s problem is misdirected love and loving the creation and not the creator. The naturalist’s view of the problem is that people are passively drifting away from nature as they grow, letting material things (vines) and lust and greed (deadly serpent) become more important and get in the way, and they actively destroy nature for progress (industrialization).

The way they get to their solutions differs. Augustine can move forward to attain the solution (since he began from the bottom, the only way to go from there is up). The naturalist must move backwards to attain the solution (since she started as being natural, beautiful, and pure but turned into something sad, helpless, and decaying). But at the same time, reverting back to nature still doesn’t promise anything more than an eternal grave.

Her solution also requires change on a global scale, to revert back to nature. Things will grow new from the dirt, but everyone seems to stray further and further from nature as they grow older, and the world itself is growing further from nature, destroying it and replacing it with material constructs. As new things grow, instead of it growing from pure soil they are growing out of increasingly unnatural soil as the world distances itself from the purest form. This is why she has to go backwards in order to attain the solution. Yes, things will grow anew, but in order to get things to grow back in their purest form, the world has to go back in time and regenerate the soil and delete the unnatural components that have seeped in and contaminated it.

The great difference that affects how they view the quality of their life on earth is that he realizes there’s something beyond the pain in the end and all she has to look forward to is a grave full of the dirt she thinks is significant.


 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Basic HTML is allowed. Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

%d bloggers like this: